Research Studies & Reports

DMV’s Research & Development Branch has been conducting research and producing studies and reports since the 1950s. Research & Development reports help DMV to measure the impact of new laws on making drivers safer. We also identify areas where we can improve our processes, explore new approaches to solving existing problems, and branch out into new opportunities to serve you better. 

Request printed copies of studies and reports by mail at:

Department of Motor Vehicles
Research and Development Branch
2415 1st Ave. Mail Station: F-126
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 914-8125

Please include the report number, the number of copies requested, and your name, address, and phone number.

393 Results

Report ID Date Published Title Section Links
69 1979/ 06

The Effects of “No Action” Negligent Operator Hearings as an Alternative to Hearings Resulting in Probation

By: Marilee E. Garretson & Raymond C. Peck

To evaluate the effectiveness of negligent operator hearings in which probation is replaced by the imposition of "no action."

III
70 1979/ 07

An Evaluation of Probation-by-Mail as an Alternative to Mandatory Hearing Attendance for Negligent Operators

By: Beverly R. Sherman & Michael Ratz

To evaluate the feasibility and traffic safety implications of placing negligent operators on probation by letter without the subjects being scheduled for a hearing.

III
71 1979/ 09

The Effectiveness of Accredited Traffic Violator Schools in Reducing Accidents and Violations

By: Raymond C. Peck, Shara Lynn Kelsey, Michael Ratz, & Beverly R. Sherman

To evaluate the effects of accredited traffic violator schools (TVS) on traffic safety

III
72 1979/ 09

Driver Improvement: A Survey of Personnel, Procedures and Work Climate

By: Roger E. Hagen & Rickey L.Williams

To survey factors which may have an influence on the outcome of the probation violator hearing project.

III
73 1980/ 02

Development of a Provisional Licensing Program for New California Drivers

By: David W. Carpenter, Bart F. Furtado, Keith H. Lindholm, & Lowell Gates

To examine the feasibility of provisional licensing procedures for new California drivers and to analyze potential program components.

II
74 1980/ 04

Application of Audio-Visual Presentation and Various Feedback Methods to Drivers License Testing: An Evaluation of Learning Effects

By: Shara Lynn Kelsey, Beverly Sherman, & Michael Ratz

To develop and demonstrate the effectiveness of an audio-visual driver's license testing program.

II
75 1980/ 07

Suspension and Revocation Effects on the DUI Offender

By: Roger E. Hagen, Edward J. McConnell, & Rickey L. Williams

(1) To assess the ability of first, second, and third DUI offenders to avoid future DUI convictions or traffic accidents; (2) to survey drivers being reinstated following a DUI suspension or revocation in order to gather information concerning admission of driving during the action, transportation alternatives used while under the licensing action, and reactions of the driver to both the action and the changes in life style which resulted thereby; and (3) to assess the incidence of driving while under licensing action as reported by drivers themselves, and by the presence of any driver record update.

III
76 1980/ 10

Design and Evaluation of a Crash Prediction Strategy

By: Edward J. McConnell & Roger E. Hagen Administration

To define and validate a method of identifying groups of high-risk drivers which yields a more effective crash prediction model than the Department's negligent-operator (neg-op) point system.

IV
77 1981/ 12

An Evaluation of Three Alternative Formats for Probation Violation Hearings

By: Rickey L. Williams & Roger E. Hagen

To develop and evaluate new formats hearings which incorporate behavior caseload-scheduling approach. for negligent operator probation violator modificatiol1 principles and a client

III
78 1981/ 02

A Profile of Uninsured Motorists in California

By: Jensen Kuan & Raymond C. Peck

To determine the profile of an average driver suspended pursuant to California's financial responsibility laws.

VI